Assessment Design and Student Stress: Comparative Evidence from Standardized Testing and Portfolio Review in Chinese and Malaysian Art Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v5i1.8.2025Keywords:
Art education, exam-related stress, standardized testing, portfolio assessment, admissions policy, cross-cultural comparisonAbstract
This study investigates differences in exam-related stress among art undergraduates in China and Malaysia, representing two distinct admissions systems: standardized testing and portfolio-based review. Using a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data from 412 students (China: n = 207; Malaysia: n = 205) were triangulated with qualitative insights from semi-structured teacher interviews. Results revealed that Chinese students reported significantly higher stress levels (M = 3.45, SD = 0.55) compared to Malaysian students (M = 3.14, SD = 0.40), with an independent-samples t-test confirming this difference (t (410) = 6.51, p < .001). Psychometric indicators demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ≥ .70) and sampling adequacy (KMO = .940, Bartlett’s χ² = 3704.466, p < .001), supporting the reliability of the measures. Thematic analysis of interview data further contextualized the findings: Chinese educators highlighted exam-oriented pressures and ambiguous grading standards as primary stressors, whereas Malaysian educators emphasized that portfolio assessments, while demanding, promote autonomy and self-expression. Collectively, the results suggest that assessment design—not merely difficulty—modulates the intensity and nature of academic stress. Integrating process-oriented elements, such as formative feedback or reflective documentation, within standardized frameworks could reduce exam anxiety without compromising academic rigor. The findings provide practical implications for admissions reform and psychological well-being in higher art education across diverse cultural contexts.Downloads
References
Abdurahim-Salain, H. (2024). Analysis of portfolio for critical thinking and creativity development among education students. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(11), 1-20. DOI: 10.59429/esp.v9i11.3199
Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. New York: Routledge.
Arumugham, K. S. (2019). Malaysian students’ perception on the use of portfolio as an assessment tool in ESL classroom. National Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(2), 27-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340950161_Malaysian_students'_perception_on_the_use_of_portfolio_as_an_assessment_tool_in_ESL_classroom
Bani Younes, Z. (2024). The students are also invited: Portfolio assessment and its impact on efl learners' critical thinking, growth mindfulness, and autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 604-628. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385504628_The_Students_are_Also_Invited_Portfolio_Assessment_and_its_Impact_on_EFL_Learners'_Critical_Thinking_Growth_Mindfulness_and_Autonomy
Bin Ponijan, A. S. A., Mat, M. F. & Leong, S. N. A. (2019). The visual arts education crisis in Malaysia: Placement of students into the arts curricular stream at the upper secondary level. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 13(1), 79-92. 10.5614/j.vad.2019.11.2.1
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148. DOI: 10.1177/003172171009200119
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.
Cassady, J. C. & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Fu, Y. (2024). The impact of Gaokao high stakes testing on student mental health in China: An analysis of stress levels and coping mechanisms among senior high school students. Research and Advances in Education, 3(5), 23-32. DOI: 10.56397/RAE.2024.05.03
Gopez, B. & Guintu, M. (2025). A review paper on teacher autonomy support, student engagement, and self-efficacy. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 20(3), 135-141. DOI: 10.54097/qkrxj681
Hickman, R., & Gormley, A. (2010). Why we make art: And why it is taught.
Hickman, R. (2023). Assessment, creativity and learning: A personal perspective. Future in Educational Research, 1(2), 104-114., DOI: 10.1002/fer3.19
Hicyilmaz, Y. (2025). An Innovative Approach in Arts Education: Student Experiences of Abstract Art Practices Supported by Generative Artificial Intelligence. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/21582440251382812
Huang, Y. (2025). The impact of exam-oriented education on Chinese students’ development and economic development. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 98(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/2025.HT23204.
Huyer, N., Dikken, J., Ellen, S., Hutter, R. I., Anne, V. & Renden, P. G. (2024). Insights in flexible assessment from students’ and teachers’ perspectives: A focus group study. Higher Education Studies, 14(3), 73-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.HT23204
Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2024). Convergent mixed methods design. In J. Katz-Buonincontro, How to mix methods: A guide to sequential, convergent, and experimental research designs (pp. 73-82). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000404-005
Khadija, S. M. (2024). The role of arts in education: Enhancing creativity and critical thinking. Research Output Journal of Education, 3(3), 66-70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383553136_The_Role_of_Arts_in_Education_Enhancing_Creativity_and_Critical_Thinking
Kirkpatrick, R. & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1, 36-45. DOI: 10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
Lee, A. & Iskandar, A. (2024). The effect of perfectionism and test anxiety on academic burnout in high school students. Journal of Adolescent and Youth Psychological Studies, 5(6), 165-173. DOI: 10.61838/kman.jayps.5.6.18
Leow, H. & Razak, R. (2024). Malaysian elementary learners’ self-regulation, motivational beliefs and learner control motivation when experiencing online tutorials. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25, 334-352. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.1262408
Li, Y. (2024). Exploring the difference in art education between China and western countries through a lens of the attitudes towards street art. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 14(6), 288-293. DOI: 10.18178/ijssh.2024.14.6.1229
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications.
Luckin, R. (2023). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. London: UCL Press.
Lukaka, D. (2023). Art education and its impact on creativity and critical thinking skills: A review of literature. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 31-39. DOI: 10.61424/ijah.v1i1.15
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). (2019). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).
Morgan, H. (2025). Using performance assessments instead of high-stakes tests: A promising strategy for a better future. Policy Futures in Education, 23(7), 1275-1290. DOI: 10.1177/14782103251328406
Pandey, M. (2025). Innovative research methods in comparative education: emerging trends and applications. Discover Education, 4(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1007/s44217-025-00616-1
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Perez-Jorge, D., Boutaba-Alehyan, M., Gonzalez-Contreras, A. I. & Perez-Perez, I. (2025). Examining the effects of academic stress on student well-being in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1-16. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04698-y
Putwain, D. W. & Symes, W. (2018). The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy, and subjective value. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 72–91. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2017.1313967
Putwain, D. W. (2008). Test anxiety and GCSE performance: The effect of gender and socio-economic background. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360802488765
Radzali, M., Yusof, I. J. & Yong, L. T. (2025). Profiling educators’ alternative assessment practices in Malaysian vocational colleges: A psychometric perspective. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(08), 6470-6483. DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.908000532
Sharim, M., Roseli, N., Yasin, S., Kuen, J. & Wen, E. (2024). Socioeconomic barriers to parental involvement in art education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(11), 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i11/23428.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Publications.
Subramaniam, M., Wardi, R. H., Ghazali, R., Kahn, S. M., Yahaya, S. R., Ismail, I. M. & Sherazi, S. M. A. (2022). A transformative approach in Malaysian art education: Revisiting practice and assessment. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 7654–7661. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/8833/5752
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Wang, J., Huang, L. & Zhang, Y. (2025). The important role of higher art education in promoting the sustainable development of aesthetic education in Chinese universities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9, 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s12564-025-10090-x.
Wang, W. (2024). Research on the current situation of student management and countermeasures in Chinese Higher Vocational Colleges and Universities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 3(1), 278-289. DOI: 10.62051/ijsspa.v3n1.40
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Yan, B. (2025). The current situation analysis and countermeasures research of college students’ subject competitions in Local Normal Universities—Taking Baoji University of Arts and Sciences as an example. Advances in Education, 15(4), 191-198. DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.154534
Yan, L. (2025). Are effects of academic stress on students’ learning motivation and screen device usage consistent in different stressful scenarios? Acta Psychologica, 257, 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105108
Yu, J. (2023). Exam culture and formative assessment in China: The Gaokao reform and its sociocultural hindrance. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 291-301. DOI: 10.54097/ehss.v23i.12900
Yusof, N., Razak, N., Nordin, N. & Zulkfli, S. (2021). Self-efficacy, motivation, learning strategy and their impact on academic performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 451-457. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/11028
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York; Plenum Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zaheril Zainudin, Xiyue Hu, Nor Asiah Ismail, Syaza Hazirah Mohd Hashim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
