The Effectiveness of Tynker and Scratch Application to Improve 4C Skills in Ecosystem Themes in Klumpit Public Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/anp.jssh.v3sp2.1.2022Keywords:
Tynker application media, scratch application media, 4C skills, ecosystem themeAbstract
The conventional learning process is felt to be less fun and fairly monotonous. In addition, learning that is only centered on teachers and books will make students bored with learning in class. This study aims to analyze the differences in the effectiveness of Tynker and Scratch application media in improving the ecosystem theme 4C skills in fifth-grade elementary school students at Public Elementary School Klumpit. This type of research is quasi-experimental or quasi-experimental type research. The sample of the experimental group in this study amounted to 30 students, namely 15 students of class V Public Elementary School No. 3 Klumpit and 15 students of class V Public Elementary School No. 7 Klumpit. Meanwhile, in the control group sample, there were 17 fifth-grade students at Public Elementary School No. 5 Klumpit. Data collection techniques in this study used interviews, observation, documentation, and tests. The data analysis technique used is the validity test which is tested by the Universitas Muria Kudus graduate lecturer validator with the results that it is feasible to use. Then the reliability test shows the application media with a coefficient of 0.0929 and the matter with a coefficient of 0.907 which has a Cronbach alpha value greater than 0.600 which means reliable. Then in the test for the similarity of variance, the value of F-count = 0.64 is obtained. For F-table = 2.69, this shows F-count F-table (0.64 2.69). This means that the data on the learning outcomes of ecosystem themes for the two treatment groups came from a homogeneous population. Thus, it can be concluded that using Tynker application media is more effective.
Downloads
References
Arnyana, I. B. P. (2019). Pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan kompetensi 4c (communication, collaboration, critical thinking dancreative thinking) untukmenyongsong era abad 21. Prosiding: Konferensi Nasional Matematika dan IPA Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi, 1(1), i-xiii.
Baker, M., Rudd, R., & Pomeroy, C. (2001). Relationships between critical and creative thinking. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 51(1), 173-188.
Cahyo, P. W., & Habibi, M. (2020). Entity Profiling to Identify Actor Involvement in Topics of Social Media Content. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 14(4), 417-428.
Dita, P. P. S., Murtono., Utomo, S., & Sekar, D. A. (2021). Implementation of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Interactive Learning Media. Journal of Technology and Humanities, 2(2), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.53797/jthkkss.v2i2.4.2021
Febriani, A., Santoso, Setiadi, G., & Pratama, H. (2022). Development of Dramatic Play Book Based on Kudus Local Wisdom for Children. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i1.3.2022
Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008, May). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean conference on information systems (Vol. 60, p. 14).
Hidayatullah, Z., Wilujeng, I., Nurhasanah, N., Gusemanto, T. G., & Makhrus, M. (2021). Synthesis of the 21st Century Skills (4C) Based Physics Education Research In Indonesia. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 88-97.
Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2404.
Khotima, D. A., Su’ad, Santoso, & Pratama, H. (2022). The Effectiveness of Android-Based Science Learning Model to Increase Student Learning Outcomes. Asian Pendidikan, 2(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v2i1.5.2022
Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity research journal, 23(4), 285-295.
Kostoff, R. N., & Schaller, R. R. (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 48(2), 132-143.
Lestari, W., Pratama, L. D., & Hidayatillah, W. (2020). Persepsi Guru dan Siswa Tentang Penggunaan Media Edutainment di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 6(2), 109-122.
Mahnun, N. (2012). Media pembelajaran (kajian terhadap langkah-langkah pemilihan media dan implementasinya dalam pembelajaran). Jurnal pemikiran islam, 37(1).
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2015). Informing and performing: A study comparingadaptive learning to traditional learning. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdicipline, 18, 111.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5-14.
Triana, D., Anggraito, Y. U., & Ridlo, S. (2020). Effectiveness of environmental change learning tools based on STEM-PjBL towards 4C skills of students. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2), 181-187.
Vesudevan, M. (2021). Teachers’ perception about factors influencing ICT integration in teaching and learning and students’ interest in lesson. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/119
Zhe, G. U. O. (2016). The cultivation of 4C’s in China—Critical thinking, communication, collaboration and creativity. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science.
Zubaidah, S. (2018, October). Mengenal 4C: Learning and innovation skills untuk menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. In 2nd Science Education National Conference (Vol. 13, pp. 1-18).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Abida Ulya, Sri Utaminingsih, Erik Aditia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
