A Literature Review of Language Assessment Scale

Authors

  • Li Gao Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA
  • Hishamuddin Ahmad Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i1.7.2024

Keywords:

Literature review, Language assessment scale, Education

Abstract

: Language assessment scales are essential tools in both educational and clinical contexts, employed to evaluate language proficiency and inform instructional strategies. This literature review seeks to identify and analyze the most highly cited studies related to language assessment scales. The aim of this research is to synthesize past findings and highlight current trends. The methodology involved a systematic search of the Scopus database, selecting articles published between 2014 and 2024 that aligned with the study’s focus. The findings revealed several critical themes: first, the importance of validating assessment tools such as the Preschool Language Assessment Scale (PreLAS) and the Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT-3: SBE) to ensure they accurately reflect the language abilities of dual language learners (DLLs). Second, the role of communicative competence in teacher education was emphasized, particularly the need for targeted teaching strategies and assessment tools. Third, the review highlighted the distinct challenges of assessing language for specific purposes (LSP) in professional contexts, especially in Asian call centres. Additionally, the review underscored the unique challenges faced by special populations, such as deaf or hard-of-hearing students, and examined the potential of content-based interventions, like shared book reading, to enhance vocabulary development among DLL preschoolers. The implications of these findings suggest that while current tools are valuable, there is a continuous need for refinement to better address the specific linguistic needs of diverse learners. This review contributes to the academic discourse by proposing themes that warrant further investigation, emphasizing the necessity for culturally relevant and psychometrically sound language assessment tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abedi, J., Zhang, Y., Rowe, S. E., & Lee, H. (2020). Examining effectiveness and validity of accommodations for English language learners in mathematics: An evidence‐based computer accommodation decision system. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(4), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12328

Aikens, N., West, J., McKee, K., Moiduddin, E., Atkins-Burnett, S., & Xue, Y. (2020). Screening approaches for determining the language of assessment for dual language learners: Evidence from head start and a universal preschool initiative. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51, 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.07.008

Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927487

Botes, E., Dewaele, J., & Greiff, S. (2021). The development and validation of the short form of the foreign language enjoyment scale. The Modern Language Journal, 105(4), 858-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12741

Colizzi, M., Lasalvia, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2020). Prevention and early intervention in youth mental health: is it time for a multidisciplinary and trans-diagnostic model for care?. International journal of mental health systems, 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00356-9

Denman, D., Speyer, R., Munro, N., Pearce, W. M., Chen, Y. W., & Cordier, R. (2017). Psychometric properties of language assessments for children aged 4–12 years: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01515

Gonzalez, J. E., Kim, H., Anderson, J., & Pollard-Durodola, S. (2024). The effects of a science and social studies content rich shared reading intervention on the vocabulary learning of preschool dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 66, 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.08.011

Gràcia, M., Jarque, M. J., Astals, M., & Rouaz, K. (2020). Desarrollo y evaluación de la competencia comunicativa en la formación inicial de maestros. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, 11(30), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2020.30.591

Kjell, O. N., Kjell, K., & Schwartz, H. A. (2023). Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, language models are poised for psychological assessment. Psychiatry Research, 115667. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yfd8g

Knoch, U., Deygers, B., & Khamboonruang, A. (2021). Revisiting rating scale development for rater-mediated language performance assessments: Modelling construct and contextual choices made by scale developers. Language Testing, 38(4), 602-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532221994052

Lau, T. H., Lee, K. Y., Lam, E. Y., Lam, J. H., Yiu, C. K., & Tang, G. W. (2019). Oral language performance of deaf and hard-of-Hearing students in mainstream schools. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(4), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz012

Lee, P., Liu, Y., & Tseng, W. (2021). One size fits all? In search of the desirable caption display for second language learners with different caption reliance in listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 400-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819856451

Lockwood, J. E. (2015). Language for Specific Purpose (LSP) performance assessment in Asian call centres: strong and weak definitions. Language Testing in Asia, 5, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-014-0009-6

North, B., & Piccardo, E. (2023). Aligning language frameworks: An example with the CLB and CEFR. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(2), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2184266

Rainelli, S., Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J., Fernandez, V. A., Greenfield, D. B., & López, M. (2017). Validity of the first two subtests of the preschool language assessment scale as a language screener for Spanish-speaking preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.08.001

Rolstad, K., & MacSwan, J. (2024). 5 bilingual language assessment: A persistent case of bias. Equity in Multilingual Schools and Communities, 54-66. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800417199-007

Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109-120.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444819000326

Stoll, M. M., Bergamo, N., & Rossetti, K. G. (2021). Analyzing modes of assessment for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using a culturally sensitive lens. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5(3), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-021-00210-0

Tabone, J. K., Rishel, C. W., Hartnett, H. P., & Szafran, K. F. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of early intervention to create trauma-informed school environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104998

Wu, H., Liu, Q., Yu, B., Zhang, Y., Ren, D., Serdarevic, M., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, K., & Chen, S. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Mandarin clinical evaluation of language for preschooler’s core scale. Journal of Communication Disorders, 87, 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106000

Zimmerman, I. L., & Castilleja, N. F. (2005). The role of a language scale for infant and preschool assessment. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(3), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20078

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Gao, L., & Ahmad, H. (2024). A Literature Review of Language Assessment Scale. Asian Pendidikan, 4(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i1.7.2024