Evaluation of Usability for Interdisciplinary Teaching Module for Enhancement of High-order Thinking Skills Among College Educators

Authors

  • Ding Zhenduo Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tamjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Syaubari Othman Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tamjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i2.8.2024

Keywords:

Usability, interdisciplinary teaching, university, high-order thinking skills, Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate an interdisciplinary teaching module (IHTM) that had been developed, and this evaluation determined the usability of the module and its instructional objectives in strengthening the higher-order thinking skills of Chinese university students. The evaluation process involved a total of 37 teachers in interdisciplinary fields; these participants included 27 young teachers and 10 expert teachers. Descriptive analyses, comparative analyses, and Fuzzy Delphi (FDM)-based expert consensus were used to derive results in terms of the module's usability. Findings indicated the module's usability and usefulness in strengthening higher-order thinking skills, and the 10-member expert panel reached a consensus on the evaluation of the module's usability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelgawad, M., & Fayek, A. R. (2010). Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 136(9), 1028-1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210

Ahmad, T. (2020). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136

Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W., & Chang, P. C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International journal of hydrogen energy, 36(21), 14172-14179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045

Gengatharan, K., Sukor Beram, N. N., & Chee, F. K. (2023). The Fuzzy Delphi Techniques in the Design and Development of Health Education Assessment Module Constructs for the Implementation of Classroom Based Assessment. Sciences, 13(3), 1485-1497. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16769

Guan, W. (2021). The complexities and moral conflicts of Chinese students’ adaption for overseas classes. Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 1-12.

Hsieh, T. Y., Lu, S. T., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International journal of project management, 22(7), 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002

Huo C., & Han Y. (2021). Cross-measurement and analysis of interdisciplinary cooperation between scholars from the perspective of China Discipline Catalogue -- A case study of Renmin University of China. Information and Data Work, 16(2), 1-15.

Klein, J. T. (2018). " Advancing" Interdisciplinary Studies: The Boundary Work of Integrating, Complexifying, and Professionalizing. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 36(2), 45-67.

Lin, C. C., & Chuang, L. Z. H. (2012). Using fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy AHP for evaluation structure of the appeal of taiwan’s coastal wetlands ecotourism. In Business, Economics, Financial Sciences, and Management (pp. 347-358). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27966-9_48

Liu, O. L., Shaw, A., Gu, L., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., ... & Loyalka, P. (2018). Assessing college critical thinking: preliminary results from the Chinese HEIghten® Critical Thinking assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), 999-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1467381

Nykyporets, S. S., Stepanova, I., & Hadaichuk, N. (2023). Tools and techniques to develop higher order thinking skills in students of non-linguistic technical universities of Ukraine during online learning. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science.№ 1117: 44–49. http://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua//handle/123456789/37921

Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J. A., Ombe, J., & Escoto, M. G. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method–A Philippine perspective. Ecological indicators, 93, 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060

Rafiq, S., Kamran, F., & Afzal, A. (2024). Investigating the benifits and challenges of interdisciplinary education in higher education settings. Journal of Social Research Development, 5(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.53664/JSRD/05-01-2024-08-87-100

Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2020). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Sage Publications.

Ridhuan, M. J. M., Syaubari, O. M., & Nurulrabihah, M. N. (2024, March). Evolution of the fuzzy Delphi analysis template (FDMv2. 0) development for impact studies. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2750, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0150051

Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking in science among secondary school students: a fuzzy Delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1452307

Sujatha, S. M., Rani, S. L., & Sangeetha, N. U. (2023). The Exemplary Leadership Qualities Of Teachers. Journal of Research Administration, 5(2), 1650-1660.

Yu, Q. X. (2019). The Structure and current characteristics of Chinese College Students' Critical Thinking Tendency and Its Relationship with family Environment and school diversity Experience. (Master's Dissertation), Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Yusof, H., Yunus J. & Musa,K.(2015). Kaedah penyelidikan: Pengurusan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-25

How to Cite

Zhenduo, D., & Othman, M. S. (2024). Evaluation of Usability for Interdisciplinary Teaching Module for Enhancement of High-order Thinking Skills Among College Educators. Asian Pendidikan, 4(2), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i2.8.2024