Exploring the Efficacy of Differentiated Assessment in UCSP: Perceptions of Senior High School Teachers and Students on Enhancing Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Marlon F. Adlit San Pedro Relocation Center National High School Main Campus, City of San Pedro, Laguna, PHILIPPINES
  • Marlene F. Adlit Laguna Resettlement Community School, City of San Pedro, Laguna, PHILIPPINES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v3i2.5.2023

Keywords:

Differentiated assessment, Constructivist Grounded Theory, Voyant Tool, UCSP, Learning outcomes

Abstract

Effective assessment is essential for supporting diverse learners in social studies, and assessing students' knowledge and skills is crucial for teachers. This qualitative study adopts a Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) approach to explore the perceived efficacy of differentiated assessment in UCSP among senior high school teachers and students. Twelve participants, including nine students and three teachers, engage in the study using purposive sampling. This study employs interviews, focus group discussions, and observations to gather rich and diverse data. The researcher utilizes the Constructivist Grounded Theory analysis, consisting of three phases, to create a theory grounded in the data and provide a comprehensive understanding of the research phenomenon. The study also utilizes the Voyant tool for web-based text analysis to aid in identifying patterns and themes. In conclusion, using the Constructivist Grounded Theory and Voyant Tool, it has been found that differentiated assessment promotes self-efficacy, creates an inclusive classroom culture, and allows for personalized instruction and feedback. Challenges include limited resources and the need for clear instructions and support. Collaboration and communication, modern teaching methods, and technology tools that prepare students for future academic endeavors are crucial for improving the effectiveness of differentiated assessment. Recommendations include providing professional development opportunities for teachers to enhance their understanding and implementation of differentiated assessment. This can focus on strategies for creating an inclusive classroom culture, utilizing technology effectively, and designing assessments. Efforts should be made to address limited resources, and conducting further research and evaluation can identify best practices in implementing differentiated assessment, informing future educational practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abudulai, I. (2020). An examination of senior high school social studies teachers’ instructional practices in the West Mamprusi Municipality. Open Access Library Journal, 7(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106186

Adlit, M. F. (2022). Harmonizing Materials and Practices of Senior High School Teachers: A Conceptual Paradigm for Contextualization across K12 Curriculum. Puissant, 3, 488-502. Scribbr. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-78590-2

Aksoy, M., & Ceylan, T. (2021). An action research on improving classroom communication and interaction in social studies teaching. Education Research International, 2021, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9943194

Almossa, S. Y., & Alzahrani, S. M. (2022). Assessment practices in Saudi higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01025-z

Alonzo, D., Bejano, J., & Labad, V. (2023). Alignment between teachers’ assessment Practices and principles of outcomes-based education in the context of Philippine education reform. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16127a

Asibey, G., & Arhin, D. (2022). Exploring Teacher Quality and Effective Teaching of Social Studies in Junior High Schools in Ghana. International Journal of Elementary Education 11(1): 11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20221101.12

Balaus, J., & Salcedo, R. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Araling Panlipunan for Junior High School. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 145-154.

Bischof, A., & Freybe, K. (2022). Grounding Theory in Digital Data: A Methodological Approach for a Reflective Procedural Framework. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.57197

Black, K. (2019). Business statistics: for contemporary decision making (11th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Scribbr. https://tinyurl.com/2p97drrt

Buragohain, D., Punpeng, G., Jaratjarungkiat, S., & Chaudhary, S. (2023, March). Impact of e-learning activities on English as a second language proficiency among engineering cohorts of Malaysian higher education: A 7-month longitudinal study. In Informatics (Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 31). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010031

Callahan, C. (2022). Formative assessment to help students decode, process, and evaluate social studies information. The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies, 83(1), 3. Scribbr. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/the_councilor/vol83/iss1/3

Carmichael, T., & Cunningham, N. (2017). Theoretical data collection and data analysis with gerunds in a constructivist grounded theory study. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 15(2), pp59-73. Scribbr. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1357

Charmaz, K. (2019). “With Constructivist Grounded Theory You Can’t Hide”: Social Justice Research and Critical Inquiry in the Public Sphere. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419879081

Charmaz, K. (2017). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612

Davidson, J., & DiGregorio, S. (2007). Qualitative Research & Technology: In the midst of a revolution. Scribbr. https://tinyurl.com/376av9xt

Deliquiña, M. J., & de Guzman, M. F. D. (2021). Differentiated Instructions in the Kto12 Social Studies Program and Students’ Academic Performance. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5, 478-481. Scribbr. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ZZG2154474481.pdf

DepEd Order No. 31, s. (2020). Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Grading in Light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan. Scribbr. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/10/02/october-2-2020-do-031-s-2020-interim-guidelines-for-assessment-and-grading-in-light-of-the-basic-education-learning-continuity-plan/

DepEd Order No. 8, s. (2015). Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment For The K to 12 Basic Education Program. Scribbr. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015-policy-guidelines-on-classroom-assessment-for-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/

Devroy, E. C. (2020). Effective Differentiation Strategies for the Secondary Social Studies Classroom [Masterʼs thesis, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. Scribbr. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/165

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3, 695-727. Scribbr. http://www.iot.ntnu.no/Innovation/Norsi-Common-ourses/Lincoln/Fontana%20&%20frey%20(2000)%20interview.Pdf

Gafforov, I., & Kosimov, K. (2022). The Role of Assessment in Language Teaching. International Journal Of Inclusive And Sustainable Education, 1(4), 31-34. Scribbr. https://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJISE/article/view/139

Gentles, S. J., & Vilches, S. L. (2017). Calling for a shared understanding of sampling terminology in qualitative research: Proposed clarifications derived from critical analysis of a methods overview by McCrae and Purssell. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917725678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917725678

Ghanney, R. A., & Agyei, E. B. (2021). Social Studies Teachers’pedagogical Content Knowledge And Its Influence On Their Assessment Practices In Junior High Schools In The West Akim Municipality, Ghana. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i8.3833

Given, L. M., & Willson, R. (2018). Information technology and the humanities scholar: Documenting digital research practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(6), 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24008

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206

Gonzales, R. D. (2023). From Face-to-Face to Virtual Student Assessment: Changes in Student Assessment Practices during COVID-19 Among Filipino Teachers. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.579

Kosimov, A. (2022). The Importance of Choosing Appropriate Assessment Tools in Language Teaching and its Impact to Second Language Acquisition. British View, 7(1). Scribbr. https://www.britishview.co.uk/index.php/bv/article/view/67

Kwarteng, P. (2022). Techniques and Strategies Use in Assessing Social Studies Concepts. Universal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 144-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.31586/ujssh.2022.381

Llego, M. A. (2022, August 26). Differentiated Instruction: A How-To Guide for Teachers. Teacher PH. Scribbr. https://www.teacherph.com/differentiated-instruction-guide-teachers/

Magayon, M. V. C., & Tan, E. B. (2020). The Road Less Taken: Differentiated Instruction (DI) as Practiced by Grade 7 Mathematics Teachers in the Philippines. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(1), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.41.3857

Meyer, S. L. (2018). Anti-Intellectual Political Rhetoric: A Grounded Theory on Twitter Echo Chambers (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF TARTU). Scribbr. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/158595512.pdf

Miller, A. (2018). Text mining digital humanities projects: Assessing content analysis capabilities of voyant tools. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(3), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2018.1479673

Mohajan, H. K., & Mohajan, D. (2023). Glaserian grounded theory and Straussian grounded theory: Two standard qualitative research approaches in social science. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 12(1), 72. Scribbr. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1195475

Navalta, C. J. D. (2021). Deepening of Learners’ Knowledge and Learning Experiences Through Contextualization and Localization Theory. Available at SSRN 3939375. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3939375

Oteng, B., Mensah, R. O., Adiza Babah, P., & Swanzy-Impraim, E. (2023). Social studies and history curriculum assessment in colleges of education in Ghana: Reflective practices of teacher educators. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2175515. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2175515

Peters, M. T., Hebbecker, K., & Souvignier, E. (2022). Effects of providing teachers with tools for implementing assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in second grade. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 47(3), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084211014

Prasad, M., & Garcia, C. (2017). How to conduct a successful focus group discussion. 1(4), 19. Scribbr. https://blog.socialcops.com/academy/resources/conduct-successful-focus-group- discussion/

Rasid, N., Nohuddin, P. N., Alias, H., Hamzah, I., & Nordin, A. I. (2017). Using data mining strategy in qualitative research. In Advances in Visual Informatics: 5th International Visual Informatics Conference, IVIC 2017, Bangi, Malaysia, November 28–30, 2017, Proceedings 5 (pp. 100-111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_10

Reed, R. N. (2019). Experiences of Secondary Social Studies Educators: The Redheaded Stepchildren of Education. University of Northern Colorado. Scribbr. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/591

Reisdorfer, C. (2020). Differentiated Assessments in a Social Studies Middle School Class. 451. Scribbr. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_cp/451/

Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Scribbr. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/

Sinclair, D. S., & Product, A. (2020). Researchers, Teachers, and Learners Seeing New Possibilities with Voyant Tools. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(2). Scribbr. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej94/ej94m1/

Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & van Driel, J. (2021). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction: An exploration in regular and talent development lessons. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001440

Supianto, Kumaidi., & Suryono, Y. (2020). Social studies teachers’ difficulties in assessing social skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2175–2183. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080557

Suson, R., Baratbate, C., Anoos, W., Ermac, E., Aranas, A. G., Malabago, N., ... & Capuyan, D. (2020). Differentiated instruction for basic reading comprehension in Philippine settings. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 3814-3824. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080904

Van Eeuwijk, P., & Angehrn, Z. (2017). How to… Conduct a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Methodological Manual. Univeristy of Basel. Basel. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-150640

Westbroek, H. B., van Rens, L., van den Berg, E., & Janssen, F. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044

Zens, A. (2021). The Impact of Differentiated Learning Activities on Student Engagement and Motivation in the English Language Arts Classroom. Dissertation, Theses and Projects, 611. Scribbr. https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/611/

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Adlit, M. F., & Adlit, M. F. (2023). Exploring the Efficacy of Differentiated Assessment in UCSP: Perceptions of Senior High School Teachers and Students on Enhancing Learning Outcomes. Asian Pendidikan, 3(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v3i2.5.2023

Most read articles by the same author(s)