Development of Neoteric Learning Modules for Year 3 Mathematical Geometry Topic: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i2.7.2024Keywords:
Neoteric approach curriculum, learning modules, subject integrationAbstract
The Neoteric Approach Curriculum is an experience and systematic educational plan based on a national curriculum that is more integrative and dynamic, covering knowledge, skills and values that are in line with local and global cultural norms and communities. (Academic of Laboratory School Education, 2020). The developed Year 3 Neoteric Learning Module integrates the subjects of Mathematics, Music and Physical Education. This study produced a year 3 mathematics learning module that has expert validity and applicability that achieves its effectiveness. Study design involved descriptive study design and quasi-experimental design. The sample for this study consists of Year 3 students of underserved schools (SKM) around Selangor and Perak. This study uses three research instruments, namely a questionnaire to test the reliability and validity of experts for the 3rd year mathematics module that has been built. The effectiveness of the module, pre-post-test will be conducted and requires pre-post-test study instrument. At the end of the study, the researcher hopes that this mathematics learning module, is able to help improve education in Malaysia by creating integrated learning to be more interesting and less burdened by a large syllabus. In addition, the researcher hopes that the findings of this study can provide a new perspective on the integrated education system that uses this neoteric approach.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A. R., & Awang, M. M. (2016, January). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) Mata Pelajaran Sejarah: Perlaksanaandan Cabaran. In Proceeding 7th International Seminar on Regional Education (Vol. 1, pp. 435-445).
Aykanian, A., & Ryan-Dedominicis, T. (2023). Teaching Note—Teaching Students About Homelessness: A Model for Curriculum Integration. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(2), 572-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1997688
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers college, Columbia University.
Benavides-Varela, S., Callegher, C. Z., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., Altoè, G., & Lucangeli, D. (2020). Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 157, 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103953
Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2021, July). Corrigendum: Developing Pre-Service Teachers Conceptualization of STEM and STEM Pedagogical Practices. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 742893). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.742893
Codreanu, E., Sommerhoff, D., Huber, S., Ufer, S., & Seidel, T. (2020). Between authenticity and cognitive demand: Finding a balance in designing a video-based simulation in the context of mathematics teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103146
Dewey, R. E. (1956). The future of philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy, 53(5), 187-196.
Ganikhanova, M., Saydikramova, U., & Khamraeva, N. (2020). Features Neoteric Of Teaching Foreign Languages Making Use Of Hi-Tech Technologies For Students Of Polytechnic Higher Education Establishments In The Republic Of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 3220-3225.
Garcia-Huidobro, J. C. (2018). Addressing the crisis in curriculum studies: curriculum integration that bridges of identity and knowledge. Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369442
Griffin, C. C., Dana, N. F., Pape, S. J., Algina, J., Bae, J., Prosser, S. K., & League, M. B. (2018). Prime online: Exploring teacher professional development for creating inclusive elementary mathematics classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417740702
Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Yusuff, N. A. N., & Mansor, R. (2017). Pembangunan modul kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di dalam mata pelajaran sains sekolah rendah: analisis keperluan guru. Sains Humanika, 9(1-5). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185
Ingwarni, S. (2018). Developing the socioculture-based thematic-integrative learning module for improving the learning motivation and the critical thinking. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 6(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v6i2.9447
Kleinke, S., & Cross, D. (2022). Remote elementary education: a comparative analysis of learner development (part 1). Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(2), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-08-2021 0055
Kusumawati, R., & Nayazik, A. (2018). Developing mathematics learning strategy module based on journal review. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i2.3110
Majani, M. Z., & Tahar, M. M. (2021). Kesediaan Guru Pendidikan Khas Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Abad Ke 21. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(4), 163-173.
Majid, N. (2022). Kesediaan guru pendidikan khas pembelajaran dalam pelaksanaan pengajaran abad ke-21 (PAK-21). Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(1), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i1.1252
Malek, N. A. F. C., & Selamat, A. Z. (2024). Kaedah Fuzzy Delphi: Reka Bentuk Modul Kurikulum Pendekatan Neoterik Bagi Subjek Pendidikan Moral Berdasarkan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah. Perspektif Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 16(1), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.37134/perspektif.vol16.1.9.2024
Marsh, C. J. (2018). Curriculum Integration. Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum 2, pp. 95–106. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315786698-9
Nason, A. M., & Hanapi, M. S. (2019). Penerapan Pendekatan Pendidikan Berasaskan Qalbu dalam Pembelajaran Abad ke-21: Cabaran dan Harapan: Application of the Qalbu-Based Education Approach in 21st Century Learning: Challenges and Hopes. ‘Abqari Journal, 20(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.33102/abqari.vol20no2.202
Ng, L. C., Hazura, A. R., & Zubaidah, S. (2020). Tahap Amalan Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 (Pak21): Satu Kajian Kes. Jurnal Pengurusan dan kepimpinan pendidikan, 33(1), 43-56.
Nugrahani, R. (2007). Media pembelajaran berbasis visual berbentuk permainan ular tangga untuk meningkatkan kualitas belajar mengajar di sekolah dasar. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 36(1),35-44. https://doi.org/10.15294/lik.v36i1.524
Ollila, J., & Macy, M. (2019). Social studies curriculum integration in elementary classrooms: A case study on a Pennsylvania Rural School. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 43(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.02.001
Polly, D., Wang, C., Martin, C., Lambert, R., Pugalee, D., & Middleton, C. (2018). The influence of mathematics professional development, school-level, and teacher-level variables on primary students’ mathematics achievement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0837-y
Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can education institution implement STEM? From Malaysian teachers’ view. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry for improving students' mathematical reasoning skills, communication and self-confidence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12
Tang, K. Y. (2021). Paradigm shifts in e-book-supported learning: Evidence from the Web of Science using a co-citation network analysis with an education focus (2010–2019). Computers & Education, 175, 104323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104323
Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Petkovic, J., Moher, D., Waters, E., White, H., ... & Wells, G. (2016). Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 70, 68-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.001
Winkler, R., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Enhancing problem-solving skills with smart personal assistant technology. Computers & Education, 165, 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104148
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhamad Fakhrul Afiz Md Fauzi, Noor Wahida Md Junus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
