The Effectiveness of Discovery Learning Model on Blood Circulation Topic at Class V Public Elementary School Gugus Garuda Demak on Student Achievement

Authors

  • Mukhlifatun Universitas Muria Kudus, 59327 Kudus, Central Java, INDONESIA
  • Slamet Utomo Universitas Muria Kudus, 59327 Kudus, Central Java, INDONESIA
  • Sumaji Universitas Muria Kudus, 59327 Kudus, Central Java, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/anp.jssh.v3sp2.15.2022

Keywords:

Effectiveness, discovery learning, blood circulation, learning outcomes

Abstract

The discovery learning model is to understand concepts, meanings, and relationships through an intuitive process to finally arrive at a conclusion. Discovery occurs when the individual is primarily involved in the use of his mental processes to discover some concepts and principles. Provide opportunities to develop and advance according to their respective abilities and interests; strengthen and increase self-confidence with the process of self-discovery because learning is student-centered with a very limited teacher role. The learning outcomes of fifth-graders at the Gugus Garuda Demak Elementary School are in the very low category. Almost the average students got a score below the minimum completeness criteria. To improve learning outcomes, the teacher presents an innovative learning model, namely the discovery learning model. This research aims to find out which is more effective in applying the discovery learning model or directly to student learning outcomes in the fifth-grade elementary school blood circulation material. The approach used in this research is pure experimental research. The requirements test consists of a normality test and a homogeneity test. Sample test T-Test. The results of this indicated that the discovery learning model is more effective in improving student learning outcomes in the fifth-grade elementary school blood circulation material compared to direct learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2017). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif, progresif, dan konteksual. Prenada Media.

Amin, S., Murtono, Madjdi, A. H., Ardianti, S. D., & Gung, Y. T. (2021). The Effect of Discovery Learning on Science Learning Achievements for Elementary School Students. Asian Pendidikan, 1(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v1i2.9.2021

Ardianto, A., Mulyono, D., & Handayani, S. (2019). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP. Inomatika, 1(1), 31-37.

Arinawati, E. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Pada Siswa Kelas V Sd Negeri Se-Gugus Permadi Kecamatan Kutowinangun Kabupaten Kebumen Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014.

Ate, Y. W. (2017). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Subtema Pelestarian Hewan Dan Tumbuhan Langka (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Pada Siswa Kelas III SDN Lengkong Besar 105/85 Kota Bandung Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017) (Doctoral dissertation, FKIP UNPAS).

Chan, L. L., & Idris, N. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400-410.

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(12).

Fahmi, F., Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students. European Journal of Education Studies.

Farida, L. A., & Rozi, F. (2022). Scaffolding Talks in Teaching Speaking Skill to the Higher Education Students, Why Not?. Asian Pendidikan, 2(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v2i1.6.2022

Hariawan, I. K., Santyasa, D. I. W., Si, M., Agustini, K., & Si, M. (2017). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 7(1).

Henri, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency‐based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of engineering education, 106(4), 607-638.

Hetherington, L., Chappell, K., Ruck Keene, H., Wren, H., Cukurova, M., Hathaway, C., ... & Bogner, F. (2020). International educators’ perspectives on the purpose of science education and the relationship between school science and creativity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 19-41.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Konstektual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21 Kunci Sukses Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Kusuma, A. P., Rahmawati, N. K., Putra, F. G., & Widyawati, S. (2020, February). The Implementation of Think Pair Share (TPS), Think Talk Write (TTW), and Problem Based Instruction (PBI) Learning Model on StudentS’Mathematics Learning Outcomes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1467, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing.

Ministry of National Education. (2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. [Indonesian Republic Act No.20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System]. Retrieve https://kelembagaan.ristekdikti.go.id/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/UU_no_20_th_2003.pdf pada 22 Juli 2021

Murugayya, C., & Nachiappan, S. (2022). Analysis of Problems in The Teaching and Learning of Science Process Skills Through Hermeneutic Method in SJK(T) from North Kinta District. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i1.1.2022

Nurcahyo, E., & Djono, D. (2018). The implementation of discovery learning model with scientific learning approach to improve students’ critical thinking in learning history. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 106-112.

Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483-520.

Rosarina, G., Sudin, A., & Sujana, A. (2016). Penerapan model discovery learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi perubahan wujud benda. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1).

Schmidt, A. F., & Finan, C. (2018). Linear regression and the normality assumption. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 98, 146-151.

Susanto, T. A., Fathurohman, I., Rismiyanto, & Pratama, H. (2022). Developing Nearpod E-Media Through Model Discovery to Improve Learning Independence for Elementary School Students. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v1i1.7.2022

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016).

Vanderstoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D. (2008). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. John Wiley & Sons.

Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of inquiry-based learning activities: The importance of beliefs about education, the self, and the context. Journal of teacher education, 70(5), 423-440.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-09

How to Cite

Mukhlifatun, Utomo, S., & Sumaji. (2022). The Effectiveness of Discovery Learning Model on Blood Circulation Topic at Class V Public Elementary School Gugus Garuda Demak on Student Achievement. ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities , 3, 107-113. https://doi.org/10.53797/anp.jssh.v3sp2.15.2022