Kajian Meta-Analisis: Penerapan Elemen Membina Hubungan di Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/anp.jssh.v3i2.10.2022Keywords:
Elemen Membina Hubungan, Pengajaran dan Pemudahcaraan (PdPc)Abstract
Elemen membina hubungan ini adalah satu elemen yang boleh diterapkan kepada murid yang mampu menyumbang kepada peningkatan pencapaian dan motivasi murid dalam proses pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc) di bilik darjah. Justeru itu, objektif kajian ini adalah untuk menganalisis secara kritikal dan sintesis trend pendidikan dan kaedah yang digunakan dalam kajian untuk menerapkan elemen membina hubungan dalam sistem pendidikan dalam konteks di Malaysia. Kajian ini telah menganalisis 8 artikel yang berkaitan yang dipilih secara rawak yang dilaksanakan oleh pengkaji di Malaysia terhadap penerapan elemen membina hubungan dari tahun 2016-2021. Hasil penemuan ini telah menunjukkan bahawa penyelidik lepas lebih cenderung memilih pendekatan penyelidikan kuantitatif yang menggunakan reka bentuk tinjauan dalam kajian yang dijalankan. Sampel yang digunakan pula melibatkan pelajar di sekolah menengah dan di institusi pengajian tinggi. Berdasarkan 8 artikel yang telah dipilih, didapati bahawa terdapat dua kajian yang berkaitan dengan keberkesanan penerapan elemen membina hubungan dalam proses pengajaran dan juga kajian berkaitan hubungan yang signifikan di antara penerapan elemen membina hubungan dengan pemboleh ubah lain seperti sikap, penglibatan ibu bapa dan sokongan rakan sebaya, faktor Control and Relevance of Schoolwork dengan Future Goals and Aspirations, perkembangan pelajar dengan objektif Personal Best, tingkah laku mencari maklumat serta pencapaian matematik sebanyak lima kajian. Secara keseluruhannya kajian yang telah dilaksanakan oleh penyelidik di Malaysia ini membuktikan bahawa elemen membina hubungan ini sesuai untuk diterapkan dan akan memberikan impak yang baik terhadap motivasi dan pencapaian pelajar dalam proses PdPc di bilik darjah.
Downloads
References
Abderrahim Benlahcene. (2020). Flourishing and student engagement in Malaysian university students: The mediating role of Personal Best (PB) Goals. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00544-8
Ab. Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U.R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytehhnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of educational Technology in Hgher Education, 15(41), 1-16
Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Aida Suraya Md Yunus, Rosnaini Mahmud, Nur Raidah Salim & Tajularipin Sulaiman (2017). Differences in students mathematic engagement between gender and between rural and urban school. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1795, 020025, 1-7.
Azina, I. N. and Halimah, A. (2012). Student factors and mathematics achievement: Evidence from timss 2007. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3):249 255.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O. & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(20), 1-30
Chantell, H. W. (2015). Increasing student engagement in the secondary math classroom. [Tesis Master, Louisiana State University]. LSU Digital commons.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed). Routledge.
Eccles, J. (2016). Engagement: where to next? Learning and instruction, 43, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4
Fung, F., Cheng, Y.T., & Gaowei, C. (2018). Student engagement and mathematics achievement: Unravelling main and interactive effects. Psychology in the School 2018, 55(4). DOI: 10.1002/pits.22139
Gopal, K., Salim, N. R. and Ayub, A. F. M. (2019). Perception of learning mathematics among lower secondary students in Malaysia: Study on students’ engagement using fuzzy conjoint analysis. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Science, 13(2), 165-185
Gray, J. A. & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environment. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1). Dicapai daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103654.pdf
Gullapyan, T. (2020). Best teaching practices to increase student interest in STEM subjects. [Doctoral Dissertation, Pepperdine University]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. (Publication No. 27994971) Dicapai daripada https://search.proquest.com/openview/2a3e46aeac2b1347c2a8d61da62f0f43/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Ismail, M. E., Samsudin, M. A., & Zain, A. N. M. (2014). A multilevel study on trends in malaysian secondary school students? science attitude: Evidence from TIMSS 2011. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(5), 572-584.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (2013-2025). Dicapai daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPPM/Preliminary-Blueprint-BM.pdf
Krauss, S. E., Kornbluh, M., & Zeldin, S. (2017). Community predictors of school engagement: The role of families and youth-adult partnership in Malaysia. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 328-337
Lee, J. S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3):177 185.
Lee, W., Lee, M.-J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self- regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(1), 86–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002.
Mohammed Iman Karim & Harris Shah Abd Hamid. (2016). Factor structure of the student engagement instrument among Malaysian undergraduates. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 30(2), 1-12
Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah. (2014). Development of activity-based mlearning implementation model for undergraduate english language learning. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya]. Universiti Malaya. Dicapai daripada https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268877015.pdf
Nur Raidah Salim & Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub. (2017). Realtionship between mathematics statistics engagement and attitudes towards statistics among undergraduates students in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings 1795, 020026, 1-6
Nurulrabihah Mat Noh. (2020). Pembangunan model pengajaran pemikiran reka bentuk sekolah rendah. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya]. Universiti Malaya.
Norakusuma Mohd Din, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2016). Influence of parental involvement and peer support on mathematics engagement among malaysian secondary school students. Malaysian Journal of Mathematics Sciences, 10S, 175-185.
Nora’asikin Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Nor Aniza Ahmad, & Sharifah Intan Sharina Syed Abdullah. (2021). Mathematics engagement: The relationship between student engagement, parental involvement, and peer influence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(5), 496-513
Shahril Effendi Ibrahim & Mohamad Afzhan Khan Mohamad Khalil. (2019). Students engagement in Open
University Malaysia Graduate Centre (OUM GC): Does information seeking behaviour plays a role? International Conference of Education, 458-466
Subramainan, L., & Mahmoud, M.A. (2020). A systematic review on student’ engagement in classroom: Indicators, challenges and computational techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1), 1-11
Thien, L. M. and Darmawan, I.-N. G. (2016). Factors associated with malaysian mathematics achievement in PISA 2012: A multilevel analysis. In Thien, L. M., Nordin, A. R., Keeves, J. P., and Darmawan, I. G. N., editors, What can PISA 2012 data tell us?, 81- 105.
Thien, L. M. and Ong, M. Y. (2015). Malaysian and Singaporean students’ affective characteristics and mathematics performance: evidence from pisa 2012. SpringerPlus, 4(1):563 577.
UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000-2015: Achievements and Challenges. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015. Paris, France. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Veiga, F. H. (2016). Assessing student engagement in school: Development and validation of a four-dimensional scale. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 813-819.
Watt, H.M.G., Caemichael, C., & Callingham, R. (2017). Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practices in mathematics education. School Psychology International, 38(2), 166-184
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. http://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mohamad Nurizwan Jumiran, Rohaidah Masri, Mazlini Adnan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
