The Effectiveness of the HVAC Escape Room in Enhancing Active Engagement and Mastery of the Fundamentals of VRF Systems and VRF Piping among Vocational College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v7i2.2.2026Keywords:
Educational escape room, gamification, student engagement, VRF systems, vocational education, action researchAbstract
Practical training in refrigeration and air-conditioning depends on access to equipment, and vocational workshops rarely have enough of it. At the Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Workshop of Sungai Buloh Vocational College a single Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) unit serves an entire class, so structured observation found that only six of 30 students were actively engaged at any moment while the remaining 24 waited their turn. This action research evaluated the HVAC Escape Room, a teacher-built gamified activity of five rotating stations covering component identification, a crossword code-breaker, piping-route sketching, a video quiz and a hands-on pipe-measurement task, designed to convert waiting time into structured learning. Thirty Diploma students took part in one Kemmis and McTaggart action research cycle. Twenty-four students completed both a 20-item pre-test and an equivalent post-test, and a ten-item perception questionnaire was administered afterwards. Mean scores rose from 12.17 to 18.30 out of 20, a gain of 6.13 marks or 30.65 percentage points, while the median rose from 12 to 19 and the minimum score rose from 6 to 11. Perceptions were uniformly positive, with an overall mean of 4.60 on a five-point scale, highest for enjoyment and lowest for systematic task completion. Because the design used a single intact group with no control group, no inferential test and no delayed post-test, these results describe change within one cohort rather than establishing a causal or durable effect. They nonetheless suggest that a low-cost gamified activity can make productive use of unavoidable waiting time in equipment-constrained workshops.
Downloads
References
Ab. Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U. R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in Polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0123-0
Abu Samah, L., Ismail, A., & Hasan, M. K. (2022). The effectiveness of gamification for students' engagement in technical and vocational education and training. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130920
Ardian, A., Munadi, S., & Jarwopuspito. (2020). Management analysis of workshop equipment and laboratory in vocational education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1446(1), Article 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1446/1/012030
Azizan, I. D., Alias, M., & Mustafa, M. Z. (2021). Effect of game-based learning in vehicle air-conditioning course on cognitive and affective skills of vocational students. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2021.13.03.014
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
Berman, E. T., Hamidah, I., Mulyanti, B., & Setiawan, A. B. (2020). Study of students' experiences of air conditioning practices in vocational education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(4), Article 042101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/830/4/042101
Dahalan, F., Alias, N., & Shaharom, M. S. N. (2024). Gamification and game based learning for vocational education and training: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1279–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11548-w
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gordillo, A., & López-Fernández, D. (2024). Are educational escape rooms more effective than traditional lectures for teaching software engineering? A randomized controlled trial. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(5), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3403913
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
Kim, C., Na, H., Zhang, N., & Bai, C. (2024). Escape rooms for education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 17(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17413a
Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(12), Article e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2025). Game creation as a pedagogical model for SDG education: A project-based approach in vocational learning. European Journal of Education, 60(4), Article e70333. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70333
Li, Y., Chen, D., & Deng, X. (2024). The impact of digital educational games on student's motivation for learning: The mediating effect of learning engagement and the moderating effect of the digital environment. PLOS ONE, 19(1), Article e0294350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294350
Looyestyn, J., Kernot, J., Boshoff, K., Ryan, J., Edney, S., & Maher, C. (2017). Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 12(3), Article e0173403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173403
Lutfi, A., Ismail, Z., Abdul Mutalib, A., Ab Latif, Z., & Che Man, S. I. (2022). The expert perception on development and usability of teaching aids “Aquaponic Mini Models” for aquaculture course. Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities, 3(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v3i1.2.2022
Ma, Z., & Li, W. (2024). Design of online teaching interaction mode for vocational education based on gamified-learning. Entertainment Computing, 50, Article 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100647
Moktar, A., Alias, B. S., & Rasul, M. S. (2025). Teachers' views on the implementation of action research. Malaysian Journal of Action Research, 2(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.61388/mjar.v2i1.7
Niittylahti, S., Annala, J., & Mäkinen, M. (2023). Student engagement profiles in vocational education and training: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(2), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1879902
Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2020). Gamification in e-learning: A Moodle implementation and its effect on student engagement and performance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2019-0030
Qi, Z., Wang, J., Du, Y., & Zhang, X. (2026). The effect of blended learning approaches on vocational school students' practical skills performance and learning behaviors: Virtual simulations or hands-on activities while accessing instructional videos. Instructional Science, 54(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09793-4
Rodrigues, L., Pereira, F. D., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Pessoa, M., Carvalho, L. S. G., Fernandes, D., Oliveira, E. H. T., Cristea, A. I., & Isotani, S. (2022). Gamification suffers from the novelty effect but benefits from the familiarization effect: Findings from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00314-6
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Scandurra, G., & Ciofi, C. (2023). Escape room game for engineering students: “Escape department”, a case study. Education Sciences, 13(8), Article 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080785
Stange, L., Hornung, T. P. P., Schuster, T. J., Mueller, B., Khatamzas, E., Kraemer, R., Zafar, A., & Baessler, F. (2026). Game-based medical education: Learning effects of an interdisciplinary and interprofessional escape room. Medical Science Educator, 36(3), 1593–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02661-3
Sureda García, I., Jiménez López, R., Álvarez García, O., & Quintana Murci, E. (2021). Emotional and behavioural engagement among Spanish students in vocational education and training. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 3882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073882
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Taraldsen, L. H., Haara, F. O., Lysne, M. S., Jensen, P. R., & Jenssen, E. S. (2022). A review on use of escape rooms in education – touching the void. Education Inquiry, 13(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1860284
Uluskan, S. (2024). EDUPERES and GAMERES: A smart interactive education platform and digital gamification for basic circuit analysis. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), Article e22754. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22754
Veldkamp, A., van de Grint, L., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in education. Educational Research Review, 31, Article 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364
Wang, C., He, J., Jin, Z., Pan, S., Lafkihi, M., & Kong, X. (2022). The impact of gamification on teaching and learning Physical Internet: A quasi-experimental study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(6), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2021-0600
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ruhaini Linda Bin Jamil, Siti Zahira Binti Yusof, Eryanie Binti Kaimi, Al- Muhammad Haris Ikhwan bin Mahizan, Mohamad Indra Fitri bin Mohamad Saney
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
