The Correlation Between Students' Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance in an Embedded Systems Course in Electrical Engineering

Authors

  • Rohaiza Baharudin Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Hussaini Abbas Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA
  • Anis Diyana Rosli Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA
  • Asmalia Zanal Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA
  • Mohammad Faizal Abd Rahman Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA
  • Adi Izhar Che Ani Electrical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pulau Pinang Permatang Pauh Branch, 13500 Seberang Prai, Penang, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v6i1.8.2025

Keywords:

Cognitive, Psychomotor, Embedded Cours, Course Outcome, Program Outcome

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between students' performance in the cognitive and psychomotor domains within the context of Electrical Measurement (ESE122) for the Diploma in Electrical Engineering program. The research aims to assess how theoretical knowledge (cognitive domain) and practical skills (psychomotor domain) contribute to overall course outcomes in this embedded course. A total of 193 students participated in the study. The course assessment is composed of 70% cognitive domain and 30% psychomotor domain. Descriptive statistical analysis, including frequency counts and measures of central tendency, was employed to evaluate student performance. Additionally, Spearman’s rank-order correlation was used to determine the association between cognitive and psychomotor scores. The findings indicate a positive correlation between the two domains, suggesting that students who excel in theoretical assessments tend to perform well in practical applications. These results highlight the importance of integrating hands-on learning with theoretical instruction to enhance student competency. The study provides insights for curriculum development, emphasizing a balanced approach to knowledge acquisition and skill application in engineering education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, K., & Al-Hameed, A. (2022). Spearman’s correlation coefficient in statistical analysis. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl, 13(October 2021).

Balid, W., Alrouh, I., Hussian, A., & Abdulwahed, M. (2012). Systems engineering design of engineering education: A case of an embedded systems course. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360407

Bhuyan, M. H. (2014). Teaching electrical circuits course for electrical engineering students in cognitive domain. Journal of Bangladesh Electronics Society, 14(1–2).

Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.

Ferris, T., & Aziz, S. (2005). A psychomotor skills extension to Bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives for engineering education. Exploring Innovation in Education and Research, March.

Hoque, M. E. (2016). Three Domains of Learning: Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor. In The Journal of EFL Education and Research (Vol. 2).

Mariyam, M., & Riwayati, R. (2018). Increased The Cognitive, Effective, and Psychomotor Aspects of Nurses in The Practice of Developmental Care. Media Keperawatan Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.1.1.2018.20-26

Mat Isa, C. M., Mustaffa, N. K., Joseph, E. O., & Preece, C. N. (2020). Development of Psychomotor Skill and Programme Outcome Attainment of Civil Engineering Students in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v1i2.2.2020

Noor, N. A. M., Saim, N. M., Alias, R., & Rosli, S. H. (2020). Students’ performance on cognitive, psychomotor and affective domain in the course outcome for embedded course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080821

Salim, K. R., Haron, H. N., Hussain, N. H., & Ali, R. (2013). The achievement of laboratory work learning outcomes: Students’ perceptions. Research in Engineering Education Symposium, REES 2013.

Salim, K. R., Puteh, M., & Daud, S. M. (2012). Assessing Students’ Practical Skills in Basic Electronic Laboratory based on Psychomotor Domain Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.687

Yasmeen, A., Yasmin, M., & Saleem, M. S. (2019). Cognitive Learning in Outcome-Based Education: A Case Study of Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering. 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing, ICIC 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC48496.2019.8966711

Zaghloul, A. R. M. (2001). Assessment of lab work: A three-domain model; Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--8931

Downloads

Published

2025-07-05

How to Cite

Baharudin, R. ., Abbas, M. H., Rosli, A. D., Zanal, A., Abd Rahman, M. F., & Che Ani, A. I. (2025). The Correlation Between Students’ Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance in an Embedded Systems Course in Electrical Engineering. Asian Journal of Vocational Education And Humanities, 6(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.53797/ajvah.v6i1.8.2025